Grove and the Goddess: Elements of Myth and Ritual
in Frederick Philip Grove's Settlers of the Marsh
by
Robert Alan Burns, Guam
This
study examines the uses of myth and ritual as structural components
of narrative discourse in Frederick Philip Grove's first novel
in English. Critics such as K. P. Stich and Robert Kroetsch
have identified psychological and mythic archetypes in Settlers,
and in her discussion of the uses of myth in several of Grove's
later novels, Nancy I. Bailey has noted the importance of Grove's
classical European education in the development of mythic archetypes
in his fiction.[1] Historically,
much of the discussion of Settlers of the Marsh has centered
around its success or failure as a realistic novel--with a number
of critics finding serious defects in the rendering of character
and setting.[2] In
1984 Camille La Bossière turned away from the paradigm of realism
to "search through the text to discern way of reading the
novel appropriate to itself" (149). La Bossière focuses
her discussion on the language of the discourse, finding in the
mind of the focal character an "entanglement of unknowing" (150)
as he struggles to overcome uncertainty, confusion, ignorance,
and silence rendered "in a language of partial or complete
privation" (159), what La Bossière calls "the negative semantics
of Settlers of the Marsh" (157). La Bossière's
excellent analysis takes an unfortunate poststructuralist turn
when she argues that the mind of Niels Lindstedt and the voice
of the extra-diegetical narrator are somehow those of Grove himself,
rather than textual artifacts.
Also
in 1984 Robert Kroetsch picked up the thread of textuality
to apply a Bahktinian semiotic critical model to a comparative
discussion of Settlers of the Marsh and In Search of
Myself. In both texts Kroetsch identifies patterns of
binary opposition in the language of the narrative. Kroetsch
claims that "behind" these binaries is the "basic tension between
signifier and signified" which can lead to the effacement of narrative
coherence (68). Kroetsch says that the way to establish or
reestablish coherence is the re-telling of stories, especially
the retelling of myths. The key myth of Settlers of the
Marsh, says Kroetsch, is the garden story, the search for a
new Eden (69).
I
have extended Kroetsch's discussion of binary oppositions
in Settlers of the Marsh to explore elements of Old World
Classical myth and ritual which are endemic to the European psyche
and which both animate and impede the protagonist's struggle for
self-definition. It will be remembered that Settlers of
the Marsh is Grove's first Canadian novel, that it was begun
in German (Kroetsch 65), and that it has at its heart the internal
conflict of Niels Lindstedt, a new immigrant to the Manitoba prairies,
struggling to overcome the limitations of his European upbringing
to make a new life for himself in Canada. What Niels does
not realize is that to change his life he must renew himself by
facing and acknowledging the dark primordial features of his own
psychic landscape. Hence, the novel is not so much a the
story of a one-way odyssey from Europe to North America as a spiritual
journey inward to achieve self-definition.
Central
to this journey are Niels' encounters with three female figures,
the Diana-like Ellen Amundsen; Clara Vogel, whose powerful sensuality
suggests Astarte or Cybele; and the wrinkled face of his mother,
an ancient, inscrutable image of the magna mater, which
repeatedly comes to him in visions. All of these women
are presented as larger than life, manifesting the three aspects
of the Great Goddess: the Maiden, the Matron, and the Crone. Niels'
interaction with these figures is presented dramatically in the
language of solar myth, employing elements of fertility ritual
to evoke Niels' quest.
Much
has been made of the "tragic intensity" of Settlers,
and some critics have compared it to classical Greek tragedy.[3] Contributing
to the intensity of the novel is Grove's use of mythic archetypes
and the imagery of solar myth and fertility ritual to highlight
the dramatization of a cluster of thematic concerns central to
the novel. This cluster is comprised of textual oppositions,
or what Kroetsch calls binary pairs, such as innocence/experience,
spirit/flesh, sacred/profane, and country/city. Several of
these textual oppositions embody the conflict within Niels Lindstedt. Others provide
a wider context within which to consider the ramifications of Niels'
struggles. The interweaving of these elements reflects Niels'
connections to his past, to his future aspirations, to the Manitoba
landscape, and to the other characters in the novel.
As
J. Lee Thompson has noted, Grove dramatizes Niels' inner
conflicts through the device of the vision, which focuses the interplay
of the internal and the external landscapes of the novel (66-68). The
content of his visions becomes increasingly concrete as Niels'
inner conflicts become more insistent. The faceless woman
of Niels' dream of domestic bliss blurs from Ellen Amundsen through
his mother to Clara Vogel as his yearning for hearth and
home becomes increasingly sexual. These three characters
are presented textually as larger-than-life embodiments of the
same conflicting elements that make up the binary pairings
that structure Niels' consciousness.
The
Diana-like, virginal Ellen combines spiritual ideality with bush-bred
independence and competence. She speaks with authority, and
her manner suggests a "self-centred repose and somewhat defiant
aloofness" (15).[4] Like
the idealized "lady-bright" of medieval romance, Ellen
is described as tall, blond, and blue-eyed, with "a pure,
Scandinavian white" complexion (15). That Ellen is meant to represent
more than an eighteen-year-old Swedish farm girl is suggested by
the description of her face: "hers was the face of a woman
. . . There was great, ripe maturity in it, and a look as if she
saw through pretences and shams and knew more of life than her
age would warrant" (15).
Ellen
has the ageless quality of a perfect ideal, as well as the protean
androgyny of a goddess. When Niels is surprised at
Ellen's Diana-like (or Selene-like) ability to handle Amundsen's
unruly team of horses, the giant Nelson points out that while these
horses are notorious for running away, they do not run away
with Ellen. She works the farm like a man, but she handles
the horses better than a man. Niels is fascinated by her "utterly
impersonal" demeanor as she moves about the farm yard doing
her chores: "Clad like a man in sheepskin and big overshoes
. . . Ellen has . . . changed from a virgin, cool and distant,
into a being that is almost sexless" (15, 36). As a
realistic character, Ellen has little to recommend her, but like
the gods and heroes of myth, she is important for what she represents,
personifies, embodies, and her actions take on significance as
symbolic rather than individualized behaviour. Even the isolation
of the Amundsen homestead has a mythic dimension, reminding Niels
of "the woodcutter's houses in fairy tales" (19).
Clara
Vogel is introduced in unequivocably feminine terms: "she
wore a light, washable dress which fitted her slender and yet plump
body without a fold. Her waist showed a v-shaped opening
at the throat which gave her--by contrast to the other women--something
peculiarly feminine; beside her, the others looked neuter. . .
. But more than anything else her round, laughing, coal-black eyes
attracted attention" (25-26). Like Ellen, Clara seems
larger than life. She seems untouched by her surroundings
and by the difficulties and poverty of pioneer existence. Immediately
after his first encounter with Clara in the Lunds' yard, Niels
is discomfited by a sense that "individual women were bent
on replacing the vague, schematic figures he had had in his mind" (38).
Niels'
initial vision, "some small room, hot with the glow and flicker
of an open
fire.
. . " (9), had been induced by the ferocity of the blizzard. By
the time he and the giant Nelson have made their moonlight return
trip from the Lunds' to the Amundsens', the vision has taken on
added features of domestic bliss: "himself and a woman, sitting
of a mid-winter night by the light of a lamp and in front of a
fire, with the pitter-patter of children's feet sounding. . ." (34). Once
Grove has introduced the device of the vision as well as two of
his three most important archetypal figures, all that remains for
the convergence and interplay of external and internal landscapes
is the introduction of the past in the person of Niels' mother. The
failure of what Niels perceives to be the hardworking Lund family
reminds him of his own hardworking mother, who died in poverty
following a life of servitude to the wealthy. From this point
on in the narrative, Niels is repeatedly reminded of his mother--in
his day-to-day experience, in his interaction with Ellen, and in
his reaction to Clara at Nelson's and Olga's wedding.
Following
a chance meeting at the Lunds' when Niels insisted on filling Ellen's
water barrels at the well, his vision would appear to have become
complete: "The picture which he saw, of himself and a woman
in a cosy room. . . There could be no doubt any longer; the woman
in the picture was Ellen, the girl . . . " (46). Frustrated,
however, by Ellen's cool, distant reserve, Niels compares the quality
of their acquaintance with his and Clara's:
How much
more intimate, he sometimes thought, was his still slender acquaintance
with Mrs. Vogel! . . . yet there was almost a secret understanding
between them. . . But whenever he had been dreaming of her and
his thought then reverted to Ellen, he felt guilty; he felt defiled
as if he had given in to sin. Her appeal was to something
in him which was lower, which was not worthy of the man who had
seen Ellen . . . (46-47)
So Virgin
and Whore, spirit and flesh, sacred and profane have precipitated
in Niels a torturous struggle to come to adult terms with the childish
innocence of his idealized vision.
When,
at Nelson's wedding, Niels notices Clara, his thoughts again revert
to Ellen before he responds to the gay widow's unspoken summons
from across the room. Unlike his previous summary descriptions
of Ellen, Grove's revelations of Clara's character are more gradual,
more contextual, more dramatic. Prior to Nelson's wedding,
Niels has seen Clara twice, once as the belle of the Sunday afternoon
gathering at the Lunds' and once several days later in the Lunds'
yard. Flirtatious and attractive, she stands out from
her surroundings in what seems to Niels to be almost super-human
detachment. Now, at Nelson's wedding, Clara's thoroughgoing
sensuality is revealed in her comments on Niels' maturation over
a three years' period: "You are changed altogether. You
are a man with a future. Your shoulders have broadened. Your
lips have become straight and firm. You have grown a moustache. I
felt sure only a woman could have worked the change. . . " (54). Much
later, during their final, dramatic quarrel, Clara will use similarly
physical terms to describe her former love for Niels: "Even
such as I do fall in love, you know. I admired your strength
of body, your build, your steely eyes, your straight mouth" (184).
As
the wedding-reception conversation develops, Clara becomes increasingly
suggestive, and Niels grows increasingly terrified. Feeling that
his chastity is under attack, he flees from Clara, yearning for
his mother's comforting touch. He sees his mother's face: "a
wrinkled, shrunk little face looking anxiously into his own . .
. what tormented him, he suddenly knew, had tormented her also;
she had fought it down. Her eyes looked into himself, knowingly,
reproachfully. There was pity in the look of the ancient
mother. . ." (59). By now the image of the crone mother
has assumed mythic dimensions of the magna mater, an ancient
and compelling force associated in Niels with feelings of vague
longing and unfulfilled Oedipal yearnings. After seeing his
mother's face, his recurrent vision of domestic bliss returns,
but with important differences. There are no signs of children;
the wife/mother place has been filled by Clara, and Niels has assumed
the posture of a religious supplicant, "crouching on a low
stool in front of the woman's seat. . . " (59).
Following
the death of Amundsen and Niels' subsequent attempts to communicate
with Ellen, Niels returns to his claim, despite his bitterness
and disappointment, to build the homestead which he had hoped to
share with Ellen. The bulk of the work is accomplished during
May and June in the evenings after the regular farmwork of daytime. Grove
describes the transition from spring to "the brief saturnalian
summer of the north" as "intoxicating" to Niels, "whose
work developed into an orgy" (73). At this point old
Sigurdsen, a spirit father-figure to both Ellen and Niels,
suggests that Niels and he pay a visit to Ellen to procure permits
for haying. En route they glimpse Ellen ahead of them, driving
her team, her wagon loaded with water barrels. Niels mistakes
her for the boy Bobby Lund until Sigurdsen corrects him. When
they arrive at Ellen's, she greets them from within the house,
instructs them to come in and to light the lamp on the kitchen
table. After Sigurdsen lights the votive lamp, Ellen
appears, transfigured, wearing a light print dress. To Niels, she
seems taller, more girlish, younger-looking in what is now
her exclusive domestic ambiance. Obviously, Grove intends
that the reader share Niels' excitement in this metamorphosis from
a seeming boy into an alluring young woman. Grove underscores
the effect by describing Ellen in supernatural terms: "For
the first time she had smiled and even laughed. She had stepped
down from her pedestal and walked among humans . . ." (76).
Returning
to his claim, Niels imagines his house as a palace, constructed
to harbour Ellen. Their friendship develops as Niels and
Sigurdsen respond to Ellen's request for help with the haying. Invited
to join her in her "bower of bliss" in back of her house,
Niels assumes the posture of a votary by sitting on the grass at
Ellen's feet, a position which becomes habitual during a long series
of visits. Again, Ellen seems ageless, ever young, perennially
mature:
He noticed
that her abundant, straw-yellow hair was no longer so severely
brushed down. It had little waves and ripples in it; a looser
way of doing it up had given it freedom to follow its natural bend. He
remembered how, as a girl, she had seemed to him singularly mature;
now that in age she was a woman, she seemed almost girlish. . .
. (82)
In their
conversation Niels reveals his ambition that his house should be
more than simple shelter, "a house of which the farm is a
part. . ." (82). Ellen responds with attention, not only
to Niels' personal ambitions, but also to his thoughts on the effects
of frontier life on pioneer men and women. Picking up this
thread of the conversation, Ellen develops her own analysis of
the role of pioneer women. Her comments are eloquent and
weighted with the authority of independence and simple integrity--credible,
but nevertheless far more penetrating than one would expect from
a person of her age and circumstances. The reader accepts
the wisdom and authority of Ellen's statements despite her youth
and lack of education because Grove has delineated her character
on the scale of a mythic archetype. Years later, after Niels
has returned from prison, Ellen's face has retained its ageless
quality: "Now as then it was the expression that held him:
hers was the face of a girl, not a woman; it was stern, to be sure,
but in sternness lay hidden the dream, the unfulfilled, uncompromising
dream of a virgin child. . . " (257).
After
Niels has finally maneuvered Ellen into his newly completed house,
he squirms in anticipation as he works in the yard: "Would
she go upstairs? To see the rooms there, half joined, half
parted by a little landing?" (88). That the rooms have
been separated by a landing suggests that Niels has prepared a
temple to house a goddess, a temple with an elevated sanctum
sanctorum that she may even sleep above him.
By
the following spring Niels' and Ellen's friendship is flourishing,
as does Niels' farm. He purchases "a team of pure-bred
Percherons, an enormous gelding, a mare for breeding, with filly
and in foal. . . " (92). Horses, Joseph Campbell tells
us, are sacred to Diana (155), and later in the novel one of the
Percherons, the gelding, will be sacrificed as Diana's new
moon of midsummer is setting.[5] Sensing
that Niels is preparing to speak to her of marriage, Ellen begins
to show more reserve toward him. By winter Niels is becoming
increasingly despondent, and as Sigurdsen's health fails, the old
man's wild, orgiastic visions stir sympathetic enthusiasms in the
frustrated younger man. Their passions reverberate in the
tempestuous winter weather.
Immediately
following a premonitory passage describing the arrival of spring and
foreshadowing the imminence of "something dreadful," Niels meets
Clara Vogel in town. The effect of the meeting on Niels is
disturbing but exciting, and the contrast between Clara and Ellen
is made dramatically apparent in Clara's frank declarations to
Niels during their dinner at the hotel: "Do you know,
Niels, how often I have thought of you during these years in the
city?. . . You are a conqueror, Niels; but you do not know
it. With women you are a child. A woman wants to be
taken, not adored" (100). Niels feels alienated in town,
impatient with sophisticated repartee and the guile of shopkeepers
and bankers. He yearns to return to his own land; but
he yearns, as well, for the voluptuous Clara. Hence,
the tension, within Niels, between country and city.[6]
In
the city Clara has been a Cybele, surrounded by votary castrati,
writers and artists whom she despises as "weaklings." Twice
during the description of the wagon ride to her country place,
the narrator refers to Clara as "an artful woman." En
route they rest, and Clara invites the unwilling Niels to lie down
with her. As she sleeps, he notices that the artificial character
of her beauty is "half stripped away; she looked like a relic
of ancient temptations. . ." (104). Just as Ellen
seems to possess eternal youthfulness, so Clara's cosmetic art
conceals a face devastated by years of dissolution. Indeed,
just before she and Niels arrive at her country cottage,
we discover that the Cybele of the city may have been a Circe of
the bush: "Niels noticed a pig coming out of the tattered
screen door of the house, grunting. . . a second pig was contentedly
lying behind a dirty couch. On a sheetless bed, covered with
grey blankets that lay in a heap, there reposed the enormous
girth of the man" (106). As Circe's charms transform
Ulysses's men, and then figuratively Ulysses, into swine, so Niels'
subsequent degradation is foreshadowed in the pigs and the pig-man
on the bed. Swine, it will be remembered, are sacred to Astarte.
In
moving into the house that Niels built for Ellen, Clara transforms
the temple into a brothel, trying to recreate in the puritanically
simple country house the luxuriance of her city lodgings. Niels,
of course, is repulsed by the exotic decor as well as by
the "strange, ardent, erratic" sexual appetite of his new wife. No
sooner has Clara become domiciled than the marriage begins to disintegrate.
Niels'
growing disgust is reflected in the emphasis in the text on Clara's
use of cosmetic art. What Niels had noticed in the face of
the sleeping Clara en route to her cottage becomes the main focus
of his later perception of his wife:
Not
only the colour of her hair was artificial, but the colour
of
her face as well . . . she used powder . . . in the morning
her
lips had looked pallid; now he noticed a greyish, yellowish
complexion
in her face. . . . From behind the mask which still
concealed
her face, another face looked out at him, like a death's
head:
the coarse, aged face of a coarse aged woman, aged before
her
time. . . the face of decay. . . (156-7)
With
the failure of her marriage, Clara's interest turns back to the
city, and she uses a toothache as the excuse to make the first
of three visits to her former home. Each of her visits coincides
with those times of the year associated with turning points in
the solar calendar, periods during which primitive fertility cults
attempted to propitiate the forces of nature to bring about bountiful
growing seasons. Clara's first visit to the city takes place
during the harvest, the autumnal equinox. After her departure,
Niels begins the fall plowing, musing on his and Clara's mutual
isolation, catching a glimpse of Ellen Amundsen through the smoke
and flame of a marsh fire. With Clara's return from the city,
their mutual alienation reasserts itself. However genuine
Niels' desire to understand his wife's point-of-view, he continues
to think of his attempts at conciliation as making "the best
of a bad bargain. . ." (166).
Clara's
second trip to the city occurs at the winter solstice, when the
ancient fertility cults celebrated the renewal of the growth cycle in
the birth of the god of the waxing year. When his wife leaves
for the city, Niels vows to offer to her the next trip at Easter,
the vernal equinox. The pattern of Clara's periodic visits
to the city and her subsequent returnings to isolate herself in
the recesses of her sanctum sanctorum functions independently,
or seemingly so, of Niels' pattern of life in operation of the
farm. And so Niels' dream of his house becoming central to
the life of the farm has faded. The house and its silent occupant
are closed off from the farm and those who work it. Niels seldom
enters the house after Clara's return from her Easter visit.
In
the summer the arrival of drought and the consequent failure of
a promising crop coincide with Niels' prevention of Clara's midsummer
visit to the city, suggesting the consequences of failure
to propitiate Cybele by allowing her to enjoy the full benefit
of ritual observance. Accused by her husband of deceit,
it now is her turn to be eloquent and authoritative. Implicit
in her frank and honest account of herself are criticisms of male
dominance, of the hypocrisy of puritan sexuality, and of the destructiveness
of mindless innocence. Despite Niels' recognition of the
validity of much that his wife has said, he is unable to transcend
his sense of having been betrayed by her infidelities. He
refuses to allow her to leave him, and so she vows to "get
even" with him. After the confrontation, Niels takes
up residence in the bunkhouse with Bobby, seldom entering the main
house. Watching the house, he continues to nurse his sense of betrayal: "It
never occurred to him yet not to blame his wife for doing what
it was her nature to do; not to judge her and to find her
guilty . . ." (191).
By
early winter Clara has become a recluse, leaving her room only
to partake of the larder, the diminution of which is the only indication
to Niels of his wife's presence in the house. Then, shortly
before Christmas, Niels and Clara meet by chance. Again,
he is struck, repelled by Clara's face: "For a fraction of
a second he had thought it was the face of a perfect stranger. It
had been that of an aging woman, yellow, lined with sharp wrinkles
and black hollows under the eyes, the lips pale like the face .
. . She had been without her makeup . . ." (195). Following
Christmas there is another meeting, another glimpse of the ravaged
face. Then begins a series of incidents during which Clara
stands by the woodstove, exposing her naked face and body in mute
statements as frank and honest as had been her verbal account of
herself the previous summer.
Grove's
most effective use of myth and ritual to reinforce the dramatic
intensity of his narrative occurs in the long passage describing
Bobby's return from the hayfield to the farmyard on the night of
the murder. Here Grove turns to advantage his considerable
talent for reflecting emotional states in landscape details. Fusing
the immediacy of particularized detail with the compelling inevitability
of tragic action, the passage begins with a focal shift to Bobby. While
reflecting on Niels' absence, Bobby is overcome by a sense of dread. In
the trip from the slough to the farm house, the landscape seems
to be animated by his sense of foreboding. It is difficult
to excerpt quotations from this passage, characterized as it is
by narrative economy in which nearly every phrase contributes to
the overall effect:
The bush
stood silent, motionless. . . The creaking and rattling of the
wheels echoed back to the driver who sat hushed on the load. .
.
Now and
then the horses snorted. . .
Even
here no sound except the desultory, almost hesitating bumps and
screeches of the rack. . .
Low in
the west, the waxing sickle of the moon was hanging. . . a little
curve of light about to set. There was no wind: but the leaves
of the aspens were rustling softly. . .
To
defend himself against a feeling of dread, the boy began for a
third time to
whistle.
Again
he stopped. The sound seemed a profanation of something.
. . (216-17)
Again
it is midsummer; the "waxing sickle of the moon" is
about to set on a scene of ritual murder, the sacrifice of sensuality
to chastity, Cybele to Diana, mother/whore to mother/virgin. One
need only remember the sacredness of horses to Diana to understand
the effect of Niels' subsequent sacrifice of the Percheron gelding. The
Percherons had been the embodiment of Niels' dream, purchased to
adorn the temple that Niels now perceives as defiled. The
sacrifice of the gelding, which Kroetsch has called "the symbolic
death of the unmanned man,"(70) Niels completes the ritual obliteration
of his dream by symbolically cutting his connection to Ellen, which
has been defined by mute service, as readily and chastely compliant
to Ellen's will as the horse had been to the pull of its master's
reins. The effect of the murder and blood sacrifice has been
to free Niels from the psychic trap of Old World myth and create
for him, after a period of ritual cleansing in prison, the possibility,
at least, for a spiritual and psychological rebirth.
[1]See K. P. Stich, "Grove's
New World Bluff," CanL 90 (1981) 111-123; Robert
Kroetsch, "The Grammar of Silence: Narrative Patterns
in Ethnic Writing," CanL 106 (1985) 65-74; and
Nancy I. Bailey, "F. P. G. and the Empty House," JCF,
31-2 (1981) 177-193.
[2]For two particularly interesting examples see especially
W. J Keith, "The Art of Frederick Philip Grove: Settlers
of the Marsh as an Example," Journal of Canadian
Studies, 9 (1974) 26-35, and Isobel McKenna, "As They
Really Were: Women in the Novels of Grove," English Studies
in Canada, 2 (1976) 109-16. While Keith praises Grove's
artistry as a realistic novelist, he finds Settlers to
be flawed, especially at points "when Grove appears to abandon
any illusion of realistic speech" (30). McKenna argues
that Grove was criticized for his description of the lives of
frontier women precisely because of the stark yet sympathetic
truth in his representation of their subjugation and consequent
suffering.
[3]See especially Desmond Pacey, "Grove's Tragic
Vision," in Frederick Philip Grove, ed. Desmond Pacey
(Toronto: Ryerson, 1970) 45-55.
[4]References to Settlers are to the 1989
New Canadian Library edition. See "Works Cited."
[5]See Robert Graves, The White Goddess (New
York: Noonday, 1966) 191.
[6]For an early discussion of "town and country" see
Keith 28-9.
Bibliography
Bailey, Nancy
I. "F.P.G. and the Empty House." Journal of
Canadian Fiction 31-32 (1981): 177-193.
Campbell, Joseph. The
Masks of God: Occidental Mythology. NY: Penguin
Books, 1977.
Graves, Robert. The
White Goddess. NY: Noonday, 1966.
Grove, Frederick
Philip. Settlers of the Marsh. Toronto:
McClelland & Stewart Ltd., 1989.
Keith,
W. J. "The Art of Frederick Philip Grove: Settlers
of the Marsh as an Example." Journal of Canadian
Studies 9.2 (1974): 26-35.
Kroetsch,
Robert. "The Grammar of Silence: Narrative Patterns
in Ethnic Writing." Canadian Literature 106 (1985):
65-74.
La Bossière, Camille R. "Of Words and Understanding
in Grove's Settlers. University of Toronto Quarterly 54.2
(1984-5): 148-62.
McKenna,
Isobel. "As They Really Were: Women in the Novels
of Grove. English
Studies in Canada 2 (1976): 109-16.
Pacey,
Desmond. "Grove's Tragic Vision." in Frederick
Philip Grove. Ed. Desmond Pacey. Toronto: Ryerson,
1970. 45-55.
Stich,
K. P. "Grove's New World Bluff." Canadian
Literature 90 (1981): 111-23.
Thompson,
J. Lee. "In Search of Order: the Structure
of Grove's Settlers of the Marsh." Journal
of Canadian Fiction 1 (1974): 65-73.
|